<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 869 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163118</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the review petition, setting aside the seizure of goods and the subsequent show-cause notice. It clarified that the seizure was illegal as it was based on misclassification, not on the absence of entries in the books of account. The court directed the respondents to release the seized goods immediately, emphasizing the court&#039;s power to review its orders to prevent miscarriage of justice and correct errors on the face of the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 869 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163118</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the review petition, setting aside the seizure of goods and the subsequent show-cause notice. It clarified that the seizure was illegal as it was based on misclassification, not on the absence of entries in the books of account. The court directed the respondents to release the seized goods immediately, emphasizing the court&#039;s power to review its orders to prevent miscarriage of justice and correct errors on the face of the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>