<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 660 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245208</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the appellant&#039;s appeal being rejected for untimely filing and lack of a personal hearing, emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with the requirement of pre-deposit waived, and the Stay Petition allowed. The decision focused on rectifying procedural deficiencies, ensuring compliance with legal provisions, and upholding fairness in the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 660 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245208</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the appellant&#039;s appeal being rejected for untimely filing and lack of a personal hearing, emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with the requirement of pre-deposit waived, and the Stay Petition allowed. The decision focused on rectifying procedural deficiencies, ensuring compliance with legal provisions, and upholding fairness in the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>