<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1498 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245207</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty, staying the demand during the pendency of the appeal. The Tribunal found that the key issue was whether the job work activities undertaken by the applicants constituted manufacturing. It directed the registry to tag the current appeal with the pending appeal related to the same issue, emphasizing the need to await the Tribunal&#039;s final decision on the manufacturing aspect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:44:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1498 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245207</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty, staying the demand during the pendency of the appeal. The Tribunal found that the key issue was whether the job work activities undertaken by the applicants constituted manufacturing. It directed the registry to tag the current appeal with the pending appeal related to the same issue, emphasizing the need to await the Tribunal&#039;s final decision on the manufacturing aspect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>