<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 636 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163095</link>
    <description>A writ petition may remain maintainable despite an available appeal where a binding departmental circular makes the appellate remedy ineffective and merely formal. The text also explains that mosquito repellent containing allethrin can fall within the statutory meaning of insecticide: entry 23 of the Third Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act covers insecticides without restricting them to agricultural use, and allethrin is treated as an insecticidal substance under the Insecticides Act. On that reasoning, classification under the residuary rate was unsustainable, and the levy had to be reassessed under the specific entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 636 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163095</link>
      <description>A writ petition may remain maintainable despite an available appeal where a binding departmental circular makes the appellate remedy ineffective and merely formal. The text also explains that mosquito repellent containing allethrin can fall within the statutory meaning of insecticide: entry 23 of the Third Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act covers insecticides without restricting them to agricultural use, and allethrin is treated as an insecticidal substance under the Insecticides Act. On that reasoning, classification under the residuary rate was unsustainable, and the levy had to be reassessed under the specific entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>