<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 591 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163077</link>
    <description>Section 3(1)(c) of the Andhra Pradesh Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2001 permitted the notified entry tax rate only within the ceiling fixed by the applicable sales tax rate for the commodity. After the repeal of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act and the commencement of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005, packing material under Schedule IV attracted 4% tax, so the notification fixing 12.5% on HDPE/PP woven fabrics and sacks exceeded the statutory limit. The later 2006 notification operated only prospectively and did not validate the earlier excess rate. G.O. Ms. No. 955 was therefore ultra vires, and the assessment based on it was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 591 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163077</link>
      <description>Section 3(1)(c) of the Andhra Pradesh Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2001 permitted the notified entry tax rate only within the ceiling fixed by the applicable sales tax rate for the commodity. After the repeal of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act and the commencement of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005, packing material under Schedule IV attracted 4% tax, so the notification fixing 12.5% on HDPE/PP woven fabrics and sacks exceeded the statutory limit. The later 2006 notification operated only prospectively and did not validate the earlier excess rate. G.O. Ms. No. 955 was therefore ultra vires, and the assessment based on it was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>