<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 550 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163073</link>
    <description>Materials supplied to contractors and paid for by deductions from running bills were treated as a sale under the U.P. Trade Tax Act because the value of cement, steel, steel products and bitumen was deducted from contractor payments, and that legal character was upheld. The turnover estimate was not properly determined because the relevant material was not examined; opening stock, outside-State purchases and closing stock had to be considered for each assessment year before making a best judgment estimate. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh consideration on turnover, while the sale character of the supply remained affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 20:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 550 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163073</link>
      <description>Materials supplied to contractors and paid for by deductions from running bills were treated as a sale under the U.P. Trade Tax Act because the value of cement, steel, steel products and bitumen was deducted from contractor payments, and that legal character was upheld. The turnover estimate was not properly determined because the relevant material was not examined; opening stock, outside-State purchases and closing stock had to be considered for each assessment year before making a best judgment estimate. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh consideration on turnover, while the sale character of the supply remained affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>