<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 548 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163071</link>
    <description>Non-maintenance of a mandatory manufacturing account under section 12(2) justified rejection of the books of account because the defect was treated as substantive, not merely technical, and the absence of supporting purchase details reinforced that result. After rejection, however, any best judgment estimate of taxable turnover had to rest on relevant material and recorded reasons. An estimate made without disclosing the basis for the figure adopted, and without considering the previous year&#039;s turnover, was held unsustainable. The books rejection was upheld, but the turnover estimate was set aside and remanded for fresh determination on a reasoned, material-based basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:47:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 548 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163071</link>
      <description>Non-maintenance of a mandatory manufacturing account under section 12(2) justified rejection of the books of account because the defect was treated as substantive, not merely technical, and the absence of supporting purchase details reinforced that result. After rejection, however, any best judgment estimate of taxable turnover had to rest on relevant material and recorded reasons. An estimate made without disclosing the basis for the figure adopted, and without considering the previous year&#039;s turnover, was held unsustainable. The books rejection was upheld, but the turnover estimate was set aside and remanded for fresh determination on a reasoned, material-based basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>