<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 559 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163056</link>
    <description>Section 21 reassessment under the U.P. Trade Tax Act requires relevant material giving rise to a bona fide reason to believe that turnover has escaped assessment; adequacy of the information is not for judicial review, and unverified sale details may suffice to found jurisdiction. A recognition certificate under section 4B cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect unless the statute clearly permits such operation. The commentary therefore distinguishes between valid reassessment jurisdiction based on nexus material and the impermissibility of backdated cancellation of statutory recognition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:16:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 559 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163056</link>
      <description>Section 21 reassessment under the U.P. Trade Tax Act requires relevant material giving rise to a bona fide reason to believe that turnover has escaped assessment; adequacy of the information is not for judicial review, and unverified sale details may suffice to found jurisdiction. A recognition certificate under section 4B cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect unless the statute clearly permits such operation. The commentary therefore distinguishes between valid reassessment jurisdiction based on nexus material and the impermissibility of backdated cancellation of statutory recognition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>