<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 663 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163049</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 could not be sustained on high electricity consumption alone. The Tribunal held that reopening requires positive material showing escapement of turnover, and that a mere mismatch between electricity use and recorded production amounts only to suspicion or conjecture. On that basis, the order of remand was upheld and the tax revision was dismissed, leaving the assessee successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:49:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 663 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163049</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 could not be sustained on high electricity consumption alone. The Tribunal held that reopening requires positive material showing escapement of turnover, and that a mere mismatch between electricity use and recorded production amounts only to suspicion or conjecture. On that basis, the order of remand was upheld and the tax revision was dismissed, leaving the assessee successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>