<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 642 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245189</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decision to disallow a capital loss on share transactions. The ITAT emphasized the lack of concrete evidence to support the claim that the transaction was a sham merely because it involved relatives. As the appeal on the capital loss issue was allowed in favor of the assessee, the jurisdiction matter was deemed of academic importance and was not addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 642 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245189</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decision to disallow a capital loss on share transactions. The ITAT emphasized the lack of concrete evidence to support the claim that the transaction was a sham merely because it involved relatives. As the appeal on the capital loss issue was allowed in favor of the assessee, the jurisdiction matter was deemed of academic importance and was not addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>