https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245186 The Tribunal directed the appellant to predeposit 50% of the anti-dumping duty amount for importing citric acid of Chinese origin declared as Korean. Despite the appellant's claims of purchasing goods on High Sea and financial hardship, the Tribunal dismissed these contentions due to the admission by the appellant's officials regarding the goods' origin. The court declined the appeal as the appellant could not even deposit 10% of the duty amount, affirming the Tribunal's decision on predeposit. This case underscores the importance of accurate declaration of goods' origin, the impact of company officials' admissions, and financial capacity in predeposit obligations. en-us Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245186 The Tribunal directed the appellant to predeposit 50% of the anti-dumping duty amount for importing citric acid of Chinese origin declared as Korean. Despite the appellant's claims of purchasing goods on High Sea and financial hardship, the Tribunal dismissed these contentions due to the admission by the appellant's officials regarding the goods' origin. The court declined the appeal as the appellant could not even deposit 10% of the duty amount, affirming the Tribunal's decision on predeposit. This case underscores the importance of accurate declaration of goods' origin, the impact of company officials' admissions, and financial capacity in predeposit obligations. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245186