<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 625 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245172</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of a capital loss on the sale of shares to his wife. The ITAT found that the Assessing Officer lacked factual basis for disallowing the loss and that the sale price was supported by evidence from the company&#039;s financial statements. It concluded that the transaction was genuine and not a sham, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the capital loss. The decision was pronounced on 27th September 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 625 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245172</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of a capital loss on the sale of shares to his wife. The ITAT found that the Assessing Officer lacked factual basis for disallowing the loss and that the sale price was supported by evidence from the company&#039;s financial statements. It concluded that the transaction was genuine and not a sham, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the capital loss. The decision was pronounced on 27th September 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>