<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 616 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245163</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, confirming that the treatment of rental income as business income was debatable. The reporting of income truthfully by the assessee did not amount to inaccurate particulars, leading to the imposition of the penalty being overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:41:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 616 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245163</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, confirming that the treatment of rental income as business income was debatable. The reporting of income truthfully by the assessee did not amount to inaccurate particulars, leading to the imposition of the penalty being overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>