<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 609 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245156</link>
    <description>Reassessment approval under Section 21(2) was held unsustainable where the authority granted sanction without considering the dealer&#039;s reply and without recording reasons. Applying natural justice, the court stated that an affected assessee must be given an opportunity of hearing and the approving authority must pass a reasoned order before granting reassessment approval, particularly where civil consequences follow. A mechanical sanction was treated as impermissible. The impugned approval and the consequential notice were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after hearing the petitioner and recording reasons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 13:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 609 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245156</link>
      <description>Reassessment approval under Section 21(2) was held unsustainable where the authority granted sanction without considering the dealer&#039;s reply and without recording reasons. Applying natural justice, the court stated that an affected assessee must be given an opportunity of hearing and the approving authority must pass a reasoned order before granting reassessment approval, particularly where civil consequences follow. A mechanical sanction was treated as impermissible. The impugned approval and the consequential notice were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after hearing the petitioner and recording reasons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>