<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 603 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245150</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Appeal seeking waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Applicant was not given adequate opportunity to respond to the show cause notice, resulting in an ex-parte order. The Tribunal found the Appellant was not afforded sufficient opportunity to present their case and remitted the matter back to the original authority for fresh consideration. The Appellant agreed to deposit Rs.15.00 Lakhs for adjudication. The impugned order was set aside, and the Appeal was allowed for reconsideration, with specific instructions for the Commissioner to re-examine the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 603 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245150</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Appeal seeking waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Applicant was not given adequate opportunity to respond to the show cause notice, resulting in an ex-parte order. The Tribunal found the Appellant was not afforded sufficient opportunity to present their case and remitted the matter back to the original authority for fresh consideration. The Appellant agreed to deposit Rs.15.00 Lakhs for adjudication. The impugned order was set aside, and the Appeal was allowed for reconsideration, with specific instructions for the Commissioner to re-examine the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>