<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 601 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245148</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods due to misdeclaration of quantity but allowed redemption upon payment of a specified fine of Rs. 10,000. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for demanding a differential duty was dismissed as they failed to prove additional payment beyond the declared transaction value. The goods, not prohibited, could be redeemed after payment, as the Commissioner did not order confiscation initially.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 601 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245148</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods due to misdeclaration of quantity but allowed redemption upon payment of a specified fine of Rs. 10,000. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for demanding a differential duty was dismissed as they failed to prove additional payment beyond the declared transaction value. The goods, not prohibited, could be redeemed after payment, as the Commissioner did not order confiscation initially.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>