<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 600 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision in favor of the importer in a case involving a rejected refund claim due to lack of supporting documents. The Commissioner (Appeals) was deemed to have the authority to remand the case for further examination, despite objections from the Revenue. The Tribunal clarified that the absence of a challenge to the assessment of the bill of entry did not hinder the filing of the refund claim, as the issue primarily stemmed from a clerical error that could be rectified under the Customs Act. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the importer&#039;s right to seek an amendment and the Commissioner&#039;s remand for document scrutiny.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:51:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 600 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision in favor of the importer in a case involving a rejected refund claim due to lack of supporting documents. The Commissioner (Appeals) was deemed to have the authority to remand the case for further examination, despite objections from the Revenue. The Tribunal clarified that the absence of a challenge to the assessment of the bill of entry did not hinder the filing of the refund claim, as the issue primarily stemmed from a clerical error that could be rectified under the Customs Act. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the importer&#039;s right to seek an amendment and the Commissioner&#039;s remand for document scrutiny.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>