https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245140 The appellant failed to comply with a deposit order despite extensions and subsequent dismissal of their Special Leave Petition. The Tribunal rejected their request for installment payment, leading to a notice questioning why their appeal should not be dismissed. The challenge to a miscellaneous order for installment payment was considered untimely, indicating an intent to delay proceedings. The non-compliance with court orders resulted in the dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and court directives. en-us Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:33:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245140 The appellant failed to comply with a deposit order despite extensions and subsequent dismissal of their Special Leave Petition. The Tribunal rejected their request for installment payment, leading to a notice questioning why their appeal should not be dismissed. The challenge to a miscellaneous order for installment payment was considered untimely, indicating an intent to delay proceedings. The non-compliance with court orders resulted in the dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and court directives. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245140