<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 629 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163032</link>
    <description>A tribunal cannot finally decide a question that was not in issue before the lower authorities without giving both parties notice and a fair opportunity to address it. Where the tribunal travels beyond the disputed point and decides the matter on a different footing, the proper course is to set aside the order and remit the matter for fresh consideration, including any incidental or ancillary issues, after hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 629 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163032</link>
      <description>A tribunal cannot finally decide a question that was not in issue before the lower authorities without giving both parties notice and a fair opportunity to address it. Where the tribunal travels beyond the disputed point and decides the matter on a different footing, the proper course is to set aside the order and remit the matter for fresh consideration, including any incidental or ancillary issues, after hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>