<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 831 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163031</link>
    <description>Penalty and interest under the return-compliance provisions were considered in the context of non-payment of tax while an assessee&#039;s deferment eligibility under an incentive scheme was under challenge. The decisive factor was whether the default was without sufficient cause: the assessee had not paid tax because the eligibility certificate was pending, and it was later granted retrospectively for the same period. On that footing, the non-payment was treated as bona fide and not wilful or deliberate, so levy of penalty and interest was not justified where the tax position depended on a retrospective determination of entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 831 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163031</link>
      <description>Penalty and interest under the return-compliance provisions were considered in the context of non-payment of tax while an assessee&#039;s deferment eligibility under an incentive scheme was under challenge. The decisive factor was whether the default was without sufficient cause: the assessee had not paid tax because the eligibility certificate was pending, and it was later granted retrospectively for the same period. On that footing, the non-payment was treated as bona fide and not wilful or deliberate, so levy of penalty and interest was not justified where the tax position depended on a retrospective determination of entitlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>