<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (10) TMI 30 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163002</link>
    <description>Trade mark protection extends to reputation in relation to the goods themselves, not merely the identity of the manufacturer, and wide use and advertising may show public association with the mark. Deceptive similarity must be assessed by comparing the marks as wholes from the standpoint of an average purchaser with imperfect recollection. Even where the goods are not of the same description, registration may still be refused if the marks are structurally and phonetically similar and the goods are trade-connected in the market. On that basis, confusion or deception was likely and refusal of registration was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 22:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (10) TMI 30 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163002</link>
      <description>Trade mark protection extends to reputation in relation to the goods themselves, not merely the identity of the manufacturer, and wide use and advertising may show public association with the mark. Deceptive similarity must be assessed by comparing the marks as wholes from the standpoint of an average purchaser with imperfect recollection. Even where the goods are not of the same description, registration may still be refused if the marks are structurally and phonetically similar and the goods are trade-connected in the market. On that basis, confusion or deception was likely and refusal of registration was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>