https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162998 Disciplinary proceedings against an income-tax officer performing quasi-judicial functions are not barred merely because the impugned acts arose in that capacity; where the allegations disclose culpability, undue favour or improper motive, the enquiry may proceed, and interlocutory restraint was unwarranted. The separate issue of provisional pension turned on the absence of any identified enabling provision to justify withholding it during the pendency of the disciplinary enquiry, so interference with the pension relief was declined at that stage, subject to liberty to seek variation before the Tribunal. en-us Fri, 27 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Oct 2018 18:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162998 Disciplinary proceedings against an income-tax officer performing quasi-judicial functions are not barred merely because the impugned acts arose in that capacity; where the allegations disclose culpability, undue favour or improper motive, the enquiry may proceed, and interlocutory restraint was unwarranted. The separate issue of provisional pension turned on the absence of any identified enabling provision to justify withholding it during the pendency of the disciplinary enquiry, so interference with the pension relief was declined at that stage, subject to liberty to seek variation before the Tribunal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162998