<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 573 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162990</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court held that questions challenging the reopening of assessment under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975, and the effect of the original and reassessment orders coexisting for the same year arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order and were fit for reference. It accepted that the alleged non-consideration of Enforcement Branch documents and the validity of the reassessment raised referable questions of law. A writ of mandamus was issued directing the Tribunal to make the reference, effectively setting aside the refusal to refer and favouring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:10:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 573 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162990</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court held that questions challenging the reopening of assessment under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975, and the effect of the original and reassessment orders coexisting for the same year arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order and were fit for reference. It accepted that the alleged non-consideration of Enforcement Branch documents and the validity of the reassessment raised referable questions of law. A writ of mandamus was issued directing the Tribunal to make the reference, effectively setting aside the refusal to refer and favouring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>