<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 554 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245101</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s reversal of CENVAT credit implied acknowledgment of the by-products as exempted final products, despite their initial argument that the by-products were not subject to Rule 6. The appellant&#039;s plea of limitation and financial hardships was considered, and the Tribunal granted waiver and stay of recovery upon the appellant&#039;s compliance with pre-deposit conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 06:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 554 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245101</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s reversal of CENVAT credit implied acknowledgment of the by-products as exempted final products, despite their initial argument that the by-products were not subject to Rule 6. The appellant&#039;s plea of limitation and financial hardships was considered, and the Tribunal granted waiver and stay of recovery upon the appellant&#039;s compliance with pre-deposit conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>