<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 553 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245100</link>
    <description>At the prima facie stage, the applicant was granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal because the dispute on the applicable excise rules and CENVAT credit required full examination at the hearing. On that interim assessment, the balance of convenience favoured protection from recovery, so the entire pre-deposit was waived and recovery remained stayed during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 06:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 553 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245100</link>
      <description>At the prima facie stage, the applicant was granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal because the dispute on the applicable excise rules and CENVAT credit required full examination at the hearing. On that interim assessment, the balance of convenience favoured protection from recovery, so the entire pre-deposit was waived and recovery remained stayed during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>