https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245098 The Tribunal upheld the retrospective effect of the amendment to Rule 2(k) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, in the second appeal. The appellant was directed to reverse the disputed CENVAT credit within six weeks. Compliance would lead to a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for penalty and interest on duty. The Deputy Registrar was tasked with monitoring compliance and reporting to the Bench. en-us Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2014 06:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245098 The Tribunal upheld the retrospective effect of the amendment to Rule 2(k) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, in the second appeal. The appellant was directed to reverse the disputed CENVAT credit within six weeks. Compliance would lead to a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for penalty and interest on duty. The Deputy Registrar was tasked with monitoring compliance and reporting to the Bench. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245098