<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 589 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162942</link>
    <description>The court quashed the penalty imposed by the Sales Tax Officer and the revisional authority due to procedural issues and the absence of mens rea. The petitioner was directed to pay the differential tax with interest at the prevailing rate. The court allowed the writ petition partially, quashing both the assessment and revisional orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:53:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 589 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162942</link>
      <description>The court quashed the penalty imposed by the Sales Tax Officer and the revisional authority due to procedural issues and the absence of mens rea. The petitioner was directed to pay the differential tax with interest at the prevailing rate. The court allowed the writ petition partially, quashing both the assessment and revisional orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>