<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 588 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162929</link>
    <description>The court upheld the penalty under section 10A for violation of section 10(d) of the Central Sales Tax Act against a TV program company for misuse of C forms. The court rejected the company&#039;s argument that the items were used for transmitting TV signals akin to power distribution, finding a violation of the Act. The penalty amount was justified at nine percent of the purchase value, reduced to two-thirds due to mitigating factors and the purpose of compensating for revenue loss. The court clarified that mens rea was not necessary for penalty imposition, emphasizing the aim to address revenue loss from C form misuse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:16:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 588 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162929</link>
      <description>The court upheld the penalty under section 10A for violation of section 10(d) of the Central Sales Tax Act against a TV program company for misuse of C forms. The court rejected the company&#039;s argument that the items were used for transmitting TV signals akin to power distribution, finding a violation of the Act. The penalty amount was justified at nine percent of the purchase value, reduced to two-thirds due to mitigating factors and the purpose of compensating for revenue loss. The court clarified that mens rea was not necessary for penalty imposition, emphasizing the aim to address revenue loss from C form misuse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>