<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 534 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245081</link>
    <description>Whether receipt of additional shares at below fair market value attracts tax as receipt of property: the note explains that shares are `property` for the purpose of the provision, and a right to acquire shares can be taxed once allotment gives rise to shares; outcome-provision can apply to such transactions. Whether decline in value of existing holdings alters chargeability: the analysis reasons that the value of additional shares derives from existing shareholding and any decline must be considered; outcome-after accounting for proportional decline, no taxable income arose. Whether proportionate allotment is a rights issue: the piece finds rights issue elements but no renunciation rights; outcome-proportionate allotment did not create additional taxable property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 534 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245081</link>
      <description>Whether receipt of additional shares at below fair market value attracts tax as receipt of property: the note explains that shares are `property` for the purpose of the provision, and a right to acquire shares can be taxed once allotment gives rise to shares; outcome-provision can apply to such transactions. Whether decline in value of existing holdings alters chargeability: the analysis reasons that the value of additional shares derives from existing shareholding and any decline must be considered; outcome-after accounting for proportional decline, no taxable income arose. Whether proportionate allotment is a rights issue: the piece finds rights issue elements but no renunciation rights; outcome-proportionate allotment did not create additional taxable property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>