<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 524 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245071</link>
    <description>The case involved issues regarding the legality of the enhanced value of imported goods, justification of imposed redemption fine and penalty, and compliance with procedural fairness. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the enhanced value based on the chartered engineer&#039;s certificate and market inquiry, confiscating the goods and imposing a redemption fine of Rs. 1 lakh and a penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs. Judge Manmohan Singh upheld this decision, while Judge Archana Wadhwa proposed setting aside the order, reducing the redemption fine and penalty to 10% and 5% of the goods&#039; value, respectively, emphasizing the adoption of transaction value unless proven otherwise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 06:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 524 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245071</link>
      <description>The case involved issues regarding the legality of the enhanced value of imported goods, justification of imposed redemption fine and penalty, and compliance with procedural fairness. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the enhanced value based on the chartered engineer&#039;s certificate and market inquiry, confiscating the goods and imposing a redemption fine of Rs. 1 lakh and a penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs. Judge Manmohan Singh upheld this decision, while Judge Archana Wadhwa proposed setting aside the order, reducing the redemption fine and penalty to 10% and 5% of the goods&#039; value, respectively, emphasizing the adoption of transaction value unless proven otherwise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>