https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245070 The Tribunal rejected the department's application for rectification of an apparent mistake in the Final Order, emphasizing that the essential facts were already considered during the hearing. The Tribunal found the arguments unconvincing, stating that the cited case was not applicable as the samples in question were not cleared for testing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that arguments based on specific rules were beyond the scope of the show-cause notice. The application was dismissed as an attempt to re-argue the case, deemed beyond the scope of the relevant legal provision. en-us Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Mar 2014 06:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245070 The Tribunal rejected the department's application for rectification of an apparent mistake in the Final Order, emphasizing that the essential facts were already considered during the hearing. The Tribunal found the arguments unconvincing, stating that the cited case was not applicable as the samples in question were not cleared for testing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that arguments based on specific rules were beyond the scope of the show-cause notice. The application was dismissed as an attempt to re-argue the case, deemed beyond the scope of the relevant legal provision. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245070