<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 521 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245068</link>
    <description>The tribunal determined that the process of lamination and printing of plastic films constituted &quot;manufacture&quot; under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Consequently, the appellant was deemed eligible to avail CENVAT Credit on inputs used and the duty payments were upheld as valid. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s claims for recovery, interest, and penalties, setting aside the previous order and granting the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 521 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245068</link>
      <description>The tribunal determined that the process of lamination and printing of plastic films constituted &quot;manufacture&quot; under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Consequently, the appellant was deemed eligible to avail CENVAT Credit on inputs used and the duty payments were upheld as valid. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s claims for recovery, interest, and penalties, setting aside the previous order and granting the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>