<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 621 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162913</link>
    <description>An amalgamation given effect from a specified date treats the transferor and transferee as one corporate entity from that date, so post-effective-date inter-company stock movements are not taxable sales under the Central Sales Tax Act. Refund of tax wrongly collected is not automatic: the dealer must satisfy the statutory anti-pass-through condition and show the burden was not passed on, reflecting the unjust enrichment principle. Refund may also be withheld where a refund order is under challenge or related proceedings are pending, subject to the statutory approval mechanism. The note concludes that while the inter-company transactions escaped sales tax, refund remained controlled by statutory conditions and could not be claimed as of right.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 621 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162913</link>
      <description>An amalgamation given effect from a specified date treats the transferor and transferee as one corporate entity from that date, so post-effective-date inter-company stock movements are not taxable sales under the Central Sales Tax Act. Refund of tax wrongly collected is not automatic: the dealer must satisfy the statutory anti-pass-through condition and show the burden was not passed on, reflecting the unjust enrichment principle. Refund may also be withheld where a refund order is under challenge or related proceedings are pending, subject to the statutory approval mechanism. The note concludes that while the inter-company transactions escaped sales tax, refund remained controlled by statutory conditions and could not be claimed as of right.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>