<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 637 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162911</link>
    <description>The Karnataka HC held that rule 20C(1)(c) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Rules is not a charging provision and does not, by itself, create tax liability. It was construed as a computational rule made to determine the extent of the concession available under section 19C of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. Any grievance about an assessing authority&#039;s calculation of the concession was treated as a matter for the statutory appeal process, not as a basis to strike down the rule. The constitutional challenge therefore failed, and the rule was upheld as a valid provision operating within the concession scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:49:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 637 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162911</link>
      <description>The Karnataka HC held that rule 20C(1)(c) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Rules is not a charging provision and does not, by itself, create tax liability. It was construed as a computational rule made to determine the extent of the concession available under section 19C of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. Any grievance about an assessing authority&#039;s calculation of the concession was treated as a matter for the statutory appeal process, not as a basis to strike down the rule. The constitutional challenge therefore failed, and the rule was upheld as a valid provision operating within the concession scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>