https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162902 The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand of Rs. 3,07,129, with the applicant liable for payment. It was determined that the applicant was responsible for service tax on services received before August 16, 2002, as per the agreement terms. The Tribunal also ruled that services allegedly rendered abroad were required to be performed in India according to the agreement. The extended period of limitation was deemed applicable due to the applicant's non-disclosure of taxable service details until demanded by the department. An interim stay was granted on the order, contingent on the applicant depositing 50% of the remaining tax amount within a specified timeframe. en-us Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162902 The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand of Rs. 3,07,129, with the applicant liable for payment. It was determined that the applicant was responsible for service tax on services received before August 16, 2002, as per the agreement terms. The Tribunal also ruled that services allegedly rendered abroad were required to be performed in India according to the agreement. The extended period of limitation was deemed applicable due to the applicant's non-disclosure of taxable service details until demanded by the department. An interim stay was granted on the order, contingent on the applicant depositing 50% of the remaining tax amount within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162902