<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 518 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245065</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty was waived and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeals because the matter was found identical to an earlier stay order in the applicants&#039; own case. Applying the same factual and legal position, the Tribunal held that interim protection was justified. The operative effect was that the appellants were relieved from making the pre-deposit and the department&#039;s recovery action remained stayed until the appeals were decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 518 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245065</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty was waived and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeals because the matter was found identical to an earlier stay order in the applicants&#039; own case. Applying the same factual and legal position, the Tribunal held that interim protection was justified. The operative effect was that the appellants were relieved from making the pre-deposit and the department&#039;s recovery action remained stayed until the appeals were decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>