<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 583 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162886</link>
    <description>An agreement for transfer of technology, technical know-how and related assistance was examined to determine whether the consideration was for mere know-how transfer or for consulting engineering services. On a prima facie reading, the continuing supply of technical documents, assistance and advice for setting up and standardising manufacture supported classification as consulting engineering. Reliance on the cess-paid technology transfer exemption did not, by itself, remove the substantial tax and penalty exposure for pre-deposit purposes. Waiver of the entire pre-deposit was declined, but conditional interim protection was granted subject to deposit of Rs. 50,00,000 within eight weeks, with waiver of the balance on compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:11:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 583 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162886</link>
      <description>An agreement for transfer of technology, technical know-how and related assistance was examined to determine whether the consideration was for mere know-how transfer or for consulting engineering services. On a prima facie reading, the continuing supply of technical documents, assistance and advice for setting up and standardising manufacture supported classification as consulting engineering. Reliance on the cess-paid technology transfer exemption did not, by itself, remove the substantial tax and penalty exposure for pre-deposit purposes. Waiver of the entire pre-deposit was declined, but conditional interim protection was granted subject to deposit of Rs. 50,00,000 within eight weeks, with waiver of the balance on compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>