<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 456 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162882</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revision petition filed by the Revenue, ruling that no grounds for imposing a penalty under Section 78(5) of the Act were established. The court emphasized the significance of conducting thorough inquiries before penalties are imposed and advised against the Revenue filing revision petitions in cases with minimal financial impact. The judgment underscores the distinction between clerical errors and deliberate tax evasion, emphasizing the importance of procedural diligence by tax authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:35:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 456 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162882</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revision petition filed by the Revenue, ruling that no grounds for imposing a penalty under Section 78(5) of the Act were established. The court emphasized the significance of conducting thorough inquiries before penalties are imposed and advised against the Revenue filing revision petitions in cases with minimal financial impact. The judgment underscores the distinction between clerical errors and deliberate tax evasion, emphasizing the importance of procedural diligence by tax authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>