<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 661 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162842</link>
    <description>An industrial incentive eligibility certificate issued by the competent State Level Committee was treated as final and conclusive for the claimed benefit. The Commercial Tax Department was not the authority to cancel, modify, or disregard that certificate, and any challenge to the assessee&#039;s entitlement, including the product classification, had to be taken before the issuing authority. On that basis, tax demand and coercive recovery could not be pursued through assessment proceedings while the certificate remained subsisting, and the assessee could not be compelled to pay tax on an asserted ineligibility for the incentive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 12:54:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 661 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162842</link>
      <description>An industrial incentive eligibility certificate issued by the competent State Level Committee was treated as final and conclusive for the claimed benefit. The Commercial Tax Department was not the authority to cancel, modify, or disregard that certificate, and any challenge to the assessee&#039;s entitlement, including the product classification, had to be taken before the issuing authority. On that basis, tax demand and coercive recovery could not be pursued through assessment proceedings while the certificate remained subsisting, and the assessee could not be compelled to pay tax on an asserted ineligibility for the incentive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>