<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 503 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245050</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in the case of M/s. Navionics Systems Pvt. Ltd. for the assessment year 2006-07. It held that the reopening of assessment under section 147 was not justified as the Assessing Officer did not have additional evidence beyond what was available during the original assessment. The tribunal emphasized that recording reasons for reopening amounted to a change of opinion, and the power to reopen cannot be used for a mere change of inference from the same facts. The tribunal also rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding non-disclosure of material facts by the assessee and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 503 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245050</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in the case of M/s. Navionics Systems Pvt. Ltd. for the assessment year 2006-07. It held that the reopening of assessment under section 147 was not justified as the Assessing Officer did not have additional evidence beyond what was available during the original assessment. The tribunal emphasized that recording reasons for reopening amounted to a change of opinion, and the power to reopen cannot be used for a mere change of inference from the same facts. The tribunal also rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding non-disclosure of material facts by the assessee and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>