<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 501 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245048</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, concluding that the assessee&#039;s share in the plotted land was 25%, contrary to the AO&#039;s estimation of 69.06%. The tribunal directed the AO to retain the income offered by the assessee in the return for the assessment year and delete the remaining addition. The order was pronounced on 12-03-2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 501 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245048</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, concluding that the assessee&#039;s share in the plotted land was 25%, contrary to the AO&#039;s estimation of 69.06%. The tribunal directed the AO to retain the income offered by the assessee in the return for the assessment year and delete the remaining addition. The order was pronounced on 12-03-2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>