https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245032 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant correctly availed Cenvat credit on CRGO Coils despite the slitting activity not amounting to manufacture. The Tribunal emphasized the acceptance of duty paid by the department without objection, citing previous case law to support the appellant's position. The decision underscored the purpose of the Cenvat credit scheme in preventing double taxation and protecting taxpayers from undue burdens, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant. en-us Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:09:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245032 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant correctly availed Cenvat credit on CRGO Coils despite the slitting activity not amounting to manufacture. The Tribunal emphasized the acceptance of duty paid by the department without objection, citing previous case law to support the appellant's position. The decision underscored the purpose of the Cenvat credit scheme in preventing double taxation and protecting taxpayers from undue burdens, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245032