<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 484 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245031</link>
    <description>Excess duty paid on a higher assessable value could not be adjusted against short-paid duty on consignments cleared through agents because the provisional assessment never became valid: although provisional assessment had been ordered, the required bond was not executed. In that , the excess payment had to be claimed by refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and could not be netted off against the demand. The short-paid duty remained recoverable under Section 11A, and the adjustment claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 484 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245031</link>
      <description>Excess duty paid on a higher assessable value could not be adjusted against short-paid duty on consignments cleared through agents because the provisional assessment never became valid: although provisional assessment had been ordered, the required bond was not executed. In that , the excess payment had to be claimed by refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and could not be netted off against the demand. The short-paid duty remained recoverable under Section 11A, and the adjustment claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>