<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 469 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245016</link>
    <description>The court addressed multiple issues concerning tax assessment, status determination, registration, and exemptions of the assessee. It clarified the classification of the assessee as an association of persons due to lack of registration under Section 12A, leading to tax and interest liabilities. The rejection of registration under Section 12A was contested, with the Tribunal ultimately supporting the assessee&#039;s claim as a trust running an educational institution. Exemption under Section 10(23C) (iiiad) was granted for specific assessment years, and the training program was recognized as an educational institution. However, ambiguity regarding the inclusion of Rs. 17 lakhs in receipts necessitated further clarification by the Tribunal for compliance purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:27:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 469 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245016</link>
      <description>The court addressed multiple issues concerning tax assessment, status determination, registration, and exemptions of the assessee. It clarified the classification of the assessee as an association of persons due to lack of registration under Section 12A, leading to tax and interest liabilities. The rejection of registration under Section 12A was contested, with the Tribunal ultimately supporting the assessee&#039;s claim as a trust running an educational institution. Exemption under Section 10(23C) (iiiad) was granted for specific assessment years, and the training program was recognized as an educational institution. However, ambiguity regarding the inclusion of Rs. 17 lakhs in receipts necessitated further clarification by the Tribunal for compliance purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>