<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 446 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244993</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that excise duty should be calculated based on transaction value rather than maximum retail price (MRP). The decision overturned duty demands and penalties imposed on the appellant and others, citing consistency in legal interpretation and previous dismissals of similar show cause notices. The Tribunal granted relief to the appellants, emphasizing the waiver of pre-deposit due to the appellant&#039;s strong case and the inability to sustain the demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:58:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 446 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244993</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that excise duty should be calculated based on transaction value rather than maximum retail price (MRP). The decision overturned duty demands and penalties imposed on the appellant and others, citing consistency in legal interpretation and previous dismissals of similar show cause notices. The Tribunal granted relief to the appellants, emphasizing the waiver of pre-deposit due to the appellant&#039;s strong case and the inability to sustain the demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>