<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (1) TMI 147 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162825</link>
    <description>A Presidential Order under Article 359(1) suspending the right to move any court for enforcement of specified fundamental rights operates as a complete bar on judicial relief within the suspended field. The article explains that this bar extends beyond direct challenges to detention and also covers indirect attempts to enforce personal liberty through objections to detention conditions, facilities, interviews, medical access and similar ancillary matters. It also notes that such questions are treated as matters for the competent Government and administrative authorities where the detention law so provides, and that judicial directions compelling facilities may fall outside maintainable review during the emergency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (1) TMI 147 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162825</link>
      <description>A Presidential Order under Article 359(1) suspending the right to move any court for enforcement of specified fundamental rights operates as a complete bar on judicial relief within the suspended field. The article explains that this bar extends beyond direct challenges to detention and also covers indirect attempts to enforce personal liberty through objections to detention conditions, facilities, interviews, medical access and similar ancillary matters. It also notes that such questions are treated as matters for the competent Government and administrative authorities where the detention law so provides, and that judicial directions compelling facilities may fall outside maintainable review during the emergency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>