https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162825 Presidential Orders under Article 359(1) suspending the right to seek enforcement of specified fundamental rights during an emergency create a complete bar on judicial proceedings seeking, directly or indirectly, to enforce those rights. This bar extends beyond release from preventive detention to challenges concerning detention conditions, facilities, interviews, medical access and private supplies where the requested relief substantively concerns personal liberty or suspended rights. Regulation of detention conditions and related concessions remains with the competent government and administrative authorities under the preventive-detention framework. High Courts cannot invalidate detention-condition clauses or issue affirmative facility directions where such relief enforces rights within the suspended field. en-us Tue, 25 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 May 2020 10:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162825 Presidential Orders under Article 359(1) suspending the right to seek enforcement of specified fundamental rights during an emergency create a complete bar on judicial proceedings seeking, directly or indirectly, to enforce those rights. This bar extends beyond release from preventive detention to challenges concerning detention conditions, facilities, interviews, medical access and private supplies where the requested relief substantively concerns personal liberty or suspended rights. Regulation of detention conditions and related concessions remains with the competent government and administrative authorities under the preventive-detention framework. High Courts cannot invalidate detention-condition clauses or issue affirmative facility directions where such relief enforces rights within the suspended field. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162825