https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162825 The Supreme Court held that writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 were not maintainable during the Emergency due to the suspension of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, 21, and 22. The Court quashed orders and directions issued by High Courts, stating detenus should seek remedies from administrative authorities, not the judiciary during the Emergency. The appeals were allowed, and High Court orders were set aside. en-us Tue, 25 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 May 2020 10:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162825 The Supreme Court held that writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 were not maintainable during the Emergency due to the suspension of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, 21, and 22. The Court quashed orders and directions issued by High Courts, stating detenus should seek remedies from administrative authorities, not the judiciary during the Emergency. The appeals were allowed, and High Court orders were set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162825