<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 575 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162822</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed against interest payment but dismissed against service tax demand and penalty. The appellant&#039;s self-assessed tax payment without Revenue direction was deemed non-refundable. The penalty for failure to file returns on time was upheld based on section 71A of the Finance Act, 1994. The decision partially allowed the appeal, as per the analysis provided, citing relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:11:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 575 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162822</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed against interest payment but dismissed against service tax demand and penalty. The appellant&#039;s self-assessed tax payment without Revenue direction was deemed non-refundable. The penalty for failure to file returns on time was upheld based on section 71A of the Finance Act, 1994. The decision partially allowed the appeal, as per the analysis provided, citing relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>