<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 509 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162819</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the tax rate of 12.5% for video conferencing equipment, ruling it falls under electronically related digital online systems, distinct from items covered by the HSN Code. The appeal was dismissed as the appellant did not challenge the original clarificatory order, affirming the classification and tax rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 17:40:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 509 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162819</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the tax rate of 12.5% for video conferencing equipment, ruling it falls under electronically related digital online systems, distinct from items covered by the HSN Code. The appeal was dismissed as the appellant did not challenge the original clarificatory order, affirming the classification and tax rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>