<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 635 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162816</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petitioner&#039;s writ challenging sales tax orders and demand for assessment year 1990-91, granting set-off on purchases made by a manufacturer with a recognition certificate under section 16-C of the M. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958. Relying on the precedent in Associated Cement Co. Ltd. v. State of M. P., the court quashed the orders and demand of Rs. 74,704, remanding the case for fresh examination in accordance with the law established in the cited case. The court emphasized the eligibility for set-off under specific sections of the Act and directed a re-examination by the authorities, ensuring a fair hearing for the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:50:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 635 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162816</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petitioner&#039;s writ challenging sales tax orders and demand for assessment year 1990-91, granting set-off on purchases made by a manufacturer with a recognition certificate under section 16-C of the M. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958. Relying on the precedent in Associated Cement Co. Ltd. v. State of M. P., the court quashed the orders and demand of Rs. 74,704, remanding the case for fresh examination in accordance with the law established in the cited case. The court emphasized the eligibility for set-off under specific sections of the Act and directed a re-examination by the authorities, ensuring a fair hearing for the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>