<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 635 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162816</link>
    <description>A dealer holding a recognition certificate under Section 16-C of the M. P. General Sales Tax Act could not claim set-off if concessional tax had already been availed on the same purchases, but the certificate alone did not bar the claim. The decisive issue was whether the assessee had in fact obtained the earlier concession, and that factual position had to be examined before denying relief. Because the authorities had not properly determined that question, the assessment demand was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration of eligibility to set-off after hearing the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:50:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 635 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162816</link>
      <description>A dealer holding a recognition certificate under Section 16-C of the M. P. General Sales Tax Act could not claim set-off if concessional tax had already been availed on the same purchases, but the certificate alone did not bar the claim. The decisive issue was whether the assessee had in fact obtained the earlier concession, and that factual position had to be examined before denying relief. Because the authorities had not properly determined that question, the assessment demand was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration of eligibility to set-off after hearing the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>