https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162814 Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 was declined because an effective and efficacious statutory appeal was available against the assessment order. The authority had issued notice, received a detailed reply and heard counsel, so no breach of natural justice or jurisdictional error was made out on the recorded facts. The Court also refrained from examining the merits of the liability challenge arising from purchase from the official liquidator, preserving the petitioner's appellate remedy. The writ petition was therefore dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal. en-us Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:45:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162814 Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 was declined because an effective and efficacious statutory appeal was available against the assessment order. The authority had issued notice, received a detailed reply and heard counsel, so no breach of natural justice or jurisdictional error was made out on the recorded facts. The Court also refrained from examining the merits of the liability challenge arising from purchase from the official liquidator, preserving the petitioner's appellate remedy. The writ petition was therefore dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162814